Scott Wiener and the California Legislature Passes SB145 Pedophilia Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children.
In January 2019, the San Francisco Examiner reported on the introduction of the bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener (D), who claimed the current law, which states oral and anal sex between an adult within ten years of the age of a willing minor requires the adult to be registered as a sex offender, discriminates against LGBT individuals. The bill would put an end to “blatant discrimination against young LGBT people engaged in consensual activity,” Wiener said: This bill is about treating everyone equally under the law. Discrimination against LGBT people is simply not the California way. These laws were put in place during a more conservative and anti-LGBT time in California’s history. They have ruined people’s lives and made it harder for them to get jobs, secure housing, and live productive lives. It is time we update these laws and treat everyone equally.
California lawmakers passed bill SB145 Monday that would reduce penalties for adults who have oral or anal sex with a willing minor child if the sex offender is within ten years of the age of the victim. Call it the Pedophile Protection Bill, because that’s what it is.
About two years ago, seeing the trend, I took the liberty of renaming the LGBTQ Movement to the LGBTQ+P For Pedophile Movement because all indications were telling me that was the direction that things were going in. On Monday of this week, the ironically-named Scott Wiener, pro-LGBTQ+ Democrat, proved me to be correct in my previous assertion. SB145 moves the state of California a giant step closer to legalizing pedophilia.
“And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!” Matthew 18:5-7 (KJB)
Obviously, California even as depraved and unmoral as they are at the moment is not able to pass a full-on bill allowing for pedophilia and pedophiles to have protected status. Something like that has to be done in stages, SB145 is one of those stages and represents a paradigm shift towards legalizing sodomy with children, which of course has always been the goal. Should Biden and Harris win in November, you can be guaranteed pedophilia will become legal in states like California, and that the LGBTQ+ will add the P for pedophile to their umbrella, and sooner rather than later.
Scott Wiener says he just wants to “treat everyone equally”, and to that I say a resounding “NO!”, pedophiles are not equal under the law, it should never become a protected category. Pedophilia is a disgusting crime against humanity, and should never be legalized on any level.
California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children
FROM BREITBART NEWS: According to SB 145, the legislation “would exempt from mandatory registration” as a sex offender “a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.”
The measure would allow a judge to decide if an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child must register as a sex offender if that person is within ten years of the age of the victim.
Last night the CA State Legislature passed #SB145 and it now goes to Gov. Newsom. It would lower the penalties for adults who have sex w/ willing same-sex minors. Judge could decide if adult has to register as sex offender if the offender is within 10 years of age of victim.
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) September 1, 2020
In January 2019, the San Francisco Examiner reported on the introduction of the bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener (D), who claimed the current law, which states oral and anal sex between an adult within ten years of the age of a willing minor requires the adult to be registered as a sex offender, discriminates against LGBT individuals.
The bill would put an end to “blatant discrimination against young LGBT people engaged in consensual activity,” Wiener said:
THIS BILL IS ABOUT TREATING EVERYONE EQUALLY UNDER THE LAW. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE IS SIMPLY NOT THE CALIFORNIA WAY. THESE LAWS WERE PUT IN PLACE DURING A MORE CONSERVATIVE AND ANTI-LGBT TIME IN CALIFORNIA’S HISTORY. THEY HAVE RUINED PEOPLE’S LIVES AND MADE IT HARDER FOR THEM TO GET JOBS, SECURE HOUSING, AND LIVE PRODUCTIVE LIVES. IT IS TIME WE UPDATE THESE LAWS AND TREAT EVERYONE EQUALLY.
Currently in California, judges may decide whether adults who have “penile-vaginal intercourse” with minors close to their age must register as a sex offender. Wiener said the current law targets LGBT individuals because they do not engage in penile-vaginal intercourse.
“THIS IS SUCH HORRIFIC HOMOPHOBIA,” WIENER SAID, ACCORDING TO THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE. “IT’S IRRATIONAL, AND IT RUINS PEOPLE’S LIVES.”
The Chronicle‘s report stated that, in 1975, California decriminalized oral and anal sex between consenting adults, but adults who engaged in these practices with minors were treated as sex offenders.
In a tweet, Wiener urged his followers to read an Associated Press “fact check” story about the controversial bill that minimizes its impact with the headline, “Bill Would Not Legalize Pedophilia in California.”
“The bill is the subject of a massive misinformation campaign by MAGA/QAnon,” Wiener posted. READ MORE
SB145 Bill In California Passes Paving The Way For Legalized Pedophilia And Sodomy With Children
This bill gives judges discretion over whether to make an adult register as a sex offender if they had anal or oral sex with a willing minor. The discretion is only allowed if the minor victim is 14-year-old or older and the statutory rapist is less than ten years older. That means a judge can give a break to a 24-year-old who seduces a same-sex 14-year-old. The law currently and wrongly gives the same judicial discretion to similar statutory rape cases if the victim and perpetrator had vaginal sex. The bill barely passed the Assembly with a vote of 41-25.